Extra Eyes a Boon to the Writing Process

A flower to dress up the post

Experienced writers armed with a worthy idea and educated in the craft of writing can create the framework for a good story in their first draft, but realize creating a great manuscript needs more than one mind and one pair of eyes.

In the recent flurry of digital publishing, the death knoll to a writer is flawed writing. The Big House Publishers provide many pairs of eyes guiding the writer to a publishable manuscript. The same level of scrutiny and assistance might not be available for digital publishing.  Writers planning to self publish or publish digitally can benefit  from critiques,  beta readers and experienced editors.

As writers, when we read our own work we miss things, nothing looks left out, wrong or unclear because the same brain that created the story fills in the blanks.  Our readers don’t get that kind of help.

Manuscripts need a thorough read by others to assist and advise the writer during the process of revision.  I learned rather late that revision and editing are not the same. Revision (not part of the first draft) includes some of the following:

  • Checking plots and subplots, World-building, Believability
  • Chapter, scene and paragraph structure, Point of view switches okay?
  • Tense, Clarity, Sequences
  • Goals, motivations, conflict, tension, dilemmas
  • Characterization and Emotional content
  • Story arc, character arcs
  • Hooks to keep the reader engaged
  • And so on …

Editing comes last, thus preventing the writer from wasting time editing passages changed or deleted during revision. Once the revisions are completed, the writer edits for style—such as varied sentence structure, stronger verbs, echoes (repeat words), tightening, fresh ways to describe, etc.  And hires an expert to do the line editing for typos, punctuation, spelling and grammar.

Who knew in the beginning of a writing career the scope involved in publishing a good book? But what an stimulating and challenging journey.

Tune in Wednesday for a discussion on critiques.

May your writing muses dance—even during the revision process.

Revising the Opener

Fire & Moonlight Ambiance

Today, the writing includes a possible solution to problems in my Work in Progress.

Critiques showed the first draft chapters didn’t create empathy for the protagonist, or contain a strong hook.  My revisions hastily eliminated chapters one and two.

Result? An agent’s later critique showed the opening didn’t give the reader a picture of the the antagonist in her ‘normal’ life. (Oops, cut too much.)

The new opener shows the nine antagonists united to meet their mandate, thwart the protagonist, hopefully thereby  creating empathy for her and hooking the reader while we see bits of her ‘norma’l life before ‘The Labyrinth’  action begins.

Hope it works.  In any case, I’ll enjoy the challenge.





Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 744 other followers

Follow Marion Spicher's Blog on WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: